Pages

Showing posts with label beauty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label beauty. Show all posts

Oct 10, 2012

Hively’s Surveying Secret: Keep It Simple As An Emoticon!!!! :)

Beware feature creep, says Hively CEO Jason Lander. His survey tool is little more than glorified emoji--and that’s the beauty of it.

Jason Lander is the CEO of Hively, a survey company that realizes you hate surveys. Its greatest weapon? Keeping things absurdly simple. Where another app might force you through a dozen pages of aimless questions, Hively will often let you get away with an action as simple as clicking on a smiley face. Hively will release an update this month that helps companies broadcast when their customers are satisfied.

FAST COMPANY: I refuse to do any Internet surveys--I find them annoying. Was Hively made with me in mind?

JASON LANDER: Absolutely. The reason everybody hates surveys is that companies are constantly sending them out. They need to get feedback, but it becomes oversaturated, and most companies ruin it. They send surveys too often, or they ask too many questions. We built Hively to flip that on its head.

Hively is extremely simple: for example, users can give feedback on an interaction with a business by just clicking a green happy face, a yellow neutral face, or a red frowny face. Did it actually take a bit of bravery to go that simple?

We got a lot of feedback early on: “That’s not a product--that’s a feature.” And we largely ignored it. A lot of those people--investors or other tech companies--are looking for the next Salesforce, the next Facebook. But most apps I use on a daily basis are very simple and singularly focused. They do one thing very well. I have no problem cobbling together a bunch of micro-apps to get the day-to-day done.

You do have other features--after clicking on the faces, users can fill out more info, and you have features that allow employers to reward employees who get good feedback. Was there a temptation to add feature after feature?


This is a very simple app, but it’s valuable. If we added features we could ruin the product very quickly. My business partner and I, this is our second startup. Our first startup, we had the exact opposite mindset. We built scheduling software for hospitals, and every time a customer asked for a feature we built it. We went from a very simple application to just adding feature after feature. One day we woke up and realized that it took anywhere from two-to-six months to implement our application, required weeks if not months of training, and that it took a whole team of people to support the application.

So you shouldn’t listen to your customers when they ask for features?

You have to find the right customers to listen to. Here’s another example: we would build features that customers would request, and then they wouldn’t even implement them. We had raised a lot of outside capital and had money to burn, so in the beginning, we’d have customers say, “Hey, we want this feature,” take six months to build it, show it to the customers, and they’d say, “Oh, we don’t want it now.” Now that we’re bootstrapping, we can’t go on these sprees of listening to every feature request. You should listen to your customers, but don’t necessarily do everything they always say.

Which ones should you listen to?

The ones who sign up for products in beta tend to be more innovative, more forward-thinking. Their ideas are very valuable. Also, customers who have really bought in, really love the product and use it all the time, and really get value out of it.

Emoji is really hot right now. Is Hively capitalizing on that trend?

It’s funny. September was the 30th anniversary of the emoticon. I never thought about it in those terms really. We did a lot of work in healthcare staffing, and they always use the pain scale, which used those faces. I thought it was just brilliant and simple--very much a universal language. With three smiley faces, no matter what language, everybody knows what they mean.

Are you a big emoticon user?

I probably overuse emoticons and exclamation points. I think the reason why is I email all the time, and I found things can come across the wrong way. The reader interprets according to whatever current mood they’re in.

Why is emoji having a big moment right now?

I don’t know. I just really like that it’s so simple. Everybody understands it. There’s no subjective interpretation.

This interview has been condensed and edited. For more from the Fast Talk interview series, click here. Know someone who'd be a good Fast Talk subject? Mention it to David Zax.


Source : fastcompany[dot]com

Sep 26, 2012

Adobe Edge Animate Seeks to Unleash the Beauty of the Web

The Web has been called many things both good and bad, but “beauty” is not a trait often associated with cyberspace. Adobe is seeking to change that with the release of Adobe Edge Animate 1.0, a set of Web design applications and services it says will allow designers and developers to “more easily create beautiful websites, digital content and mobile apps.”

Adobe Edge Animate, which also serves as Adobe Edge Preview 7 (Preview is now known as Edge Animate)  leverages standard Web development languages such as HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript. Notable features include a timeline editor that allows the editing of property-based keyframes with enhanced easing equations, an intuitive Webkit-based interface, reusable symbols, native HTML support, resizable layouts and mobile-ready content.

adobe-edge-animate.png

Adobe Travels to the Edge of Web Design

As reported by CMSWire in August 2011, the initial version of Edge Preview which later developed into Edge Animate was intended to be an HTML5 web motion and interaction design tool that allows web designers to bring animation, similar to that created in Flash Professional, to websites using standards likes HTML, JavaScript and CSS. Adobe cited “rapid changes around HTML5” as the impetus for adopting an open development methodology for Adobe Edge. Since then, the product now known as Edge Ainmate has evolved quite a bit, no doubt aided by the extensive public preview/feedback period.

‘Doubling Down’ on HTML

With Edge Animate 1.0, Adobe is “doubling down" on HTML, according to Webmonkey. While a Webmonkey article on the new solution expresses disappointment that Animate fails to output canvas or sustainable vector graphics, compliments Edge Animate 1.0 for helping “Flash refugees” create standards-based animations for sites, apps and other digital content.

“Today’s web developers shouldn’t need the same archaic text editors we used to build the Web fifteen years ago,” the article concludes. “Tools like Edge Animate … may not be everyone’s cup of tea, but they go a long way toward helping people who want a more intuitive way to create cool stuff on the Web and that’s almost never a bad thing.”

The first release of Edge Animate, normally priced at US$ 499, will be made available for a limited time as part of a free Adobe Creative Cloud membership. When the free intro period ends it will be available as a standalone app for US$ 500 or as part of the US$ 50/month Creative Cloud subscription. It is compatible with Windows and Mac OS and available in German, English, French, Spanish, Italian and Japanese.

 
 

Source : cmswire[dot]com