Pages

Showing posts with label takeaways. Show all posts
Showing posts with label takeaways. Show all posts

Oct 26, 2012

How Obama And Romney Each Built A "Brand Of You"

President Obama and Governor Romney aren't just politicians--they're also Jedi masters of personal branding. Here are the 3 top takeaways from the election that leaders can apply when shaping their own professional brand.

Politicians tend to be masters at personal branding, especially once they reach the presidential (or presidential-hopeful) level. In doing research for my book, I found politicians as astute at personal branding as Hollywood celebrities are. Look at the political campaign process is as a series of high-stakes, intense “job interviews” by the best of class--which is easy to do during televised debates and seemingly endless public campaign stops--and you’ll find personal branding lessons that you can apply in business.

Here are my top 3 personal branding take-aways from the 2012 presidential race:

1. Have a clear value proposition that differentiates you from others.
Personal branding is not just about defining your brand, it’s about defining the benefits of your approach and how you are different, even better, than others. In the debates, Mitt Romney built his value proposition around a pro-growth, pro-jobs agenda for middle-class Americans. And he branded President Obama as a failed leader with job-killing policies. In contrast, President Obama positioned himself as the true leader of the middle-class and branded Romney as the leader of the one percent.

Takeaway: Make sure that you can brand yourself in a sentence. Your brand sentence is your differentiator that captures the essence of your brand identity. It should describe your value proposition – the value you bring that’s different from what others bring. For example, an innovative sales executive in new media described her brand this way, “I reimagine underperforming assets across the converging worlds of Hollywood, Silicon Valley, and Wall Street.”

2. Realize that style and personality count as much as substance.
Likeability is important for politicians as well as brands. In the branding world, the Q Score is a measure of a brand’s or celebrity’s likeability, and a high Q Score gives them a pricing premium in the marketplace. Likeability is important for people too, whether you are interviewing for a job, making a sales call or interacting in a meeting. Above all, you need to project energy, openness and connection, and your body language and facial expressions can help you do all three.

In the first debate, Obama was roundly criticized for his low-energy delivery style and aloof demeanor. He seemed listless and didn’t make eye contact much with Romney or the television audience. Obama was clearly not on top of his game. Bottom line, he didn’t seem that likeable or even appear presidential, and it hurt him in the polls afterwards until he got on the offensive with an energetic, authoritative speaking and debating style that had always characterized his brand. Likewise, early in the campaign, Romney was dogged by an image of being an elitist, which made him hard for many people to like or even relate to. Yet Romney’s authoritative yet engaging style in the first debate completely changed perceptions and made him seem more likable and more presidential. And his more likable personal image propelled him forward in the polls.

Takeaway: Like it or not, style counts as much or even more than substance, particularly a likable style that people can identify with. Realize that you’re always onstage, whether it’s a small stage in a one-to-one meeting or a large stage presenting to a large group. Actors and performers not only practice through weeks of rehearsals, the do a mental rehearsal along with other preparatory exercises before they go onstage. The goal is to get in the right frame of mind to “become one with the audience.” Great actors and presenters engage the hearts and minds of an audience. So speak colloquial English. Don’t read your talk. Internalize it. Talk personally, not formally. If you are in front of a large group, select different audience members in the four quadrants of the room and look them in the eye. That way, everyone will think you are talking directly to them.

3. Carefully edit and “curate” your message.
There is so much noise and data, it’s hard to make sense of it all. Notice how smart politicians don’t numb the audience with a laundry list of points or statistics but frame their arguments with a small group of select points. They also use stories, particular personal stories to make sure the message resonates. (“Last week I meet a voter in Philadelphia…”) Stories are sticky; they are memory magnets. Of course, in telling your story, you have to make sure you phrase it right--or you end up with the viral phenomenon that Romney’s story about “binders of women” created.

Takeaway: Don’t numb your audience with too many statistics: bullet, bullet, bullet; number, number, number, pie chart, pie chart, pie chart. Focus on the important points and statistics, and above all, pepper your talk with relevant stories if you want them to be remembered. When you’re presenting options in a pitch or support an important point, three is the right number, not five or ten or twenty. One or two is too few, yet four or more will lead to confusion and a lack of decision. There are the “The Three Little Pigs,” “Three Blind Mice,” and “The Three Musketeers,” and the list goes on and on. So make it easy on your audience and stick to three. Three is often a good internal structure to use in a talk to simplify the logic around an argument or point of view. The U.S. Declaration of Independence speaks of “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” The number three has a sense of completeness that is powerful and easy for your audience to remember.

You may not be planning to run for office any time soon, but political candidates and campaigns are filled with lessons in how to create an effective personal style that will help you be more successful no matter what you do.

Catherine Kaputa is the author of You Are a Brand: In Person and Online, How Smart People Brand Themselves for Business Success.


Source : fastcompany[dot]com

Aug 20, 2012

Forrester Wave: Enterprises Concerned Over Cloud-Based Collaboration Feasibility

There are a number of surprising takeaways from a new Forrester Wave report that should force many collaboration vendors to think through their development strategies twice. Not least of these is that despite all the progress that has been made, many IT leaders are still questioning the feasibility of cloud-based collaboration tools.

Cloud-based Online Collaboration

The report, Forrester Wave: Cloud Strategies Of Online Collaboration Software Vendors, Q3 2012, is based on research compiled by TJ Keitt and is the result of surveys sent to 2,438 IT executives and technology decision-makers located in Canada, France, Germany, the UK and the US working in everything from SMBs to large enterprises.

It identified what Forrester describes as eight significant collaboration services providers — Box, Cisco Systems, Citrix Online, Google, IBM, Microsoft, salesforce.com, and Yammer — that were scored on over 38 criteria.

Today we will look at some of the issues that this evaluation raised, while tomorrow we will look at the five companies that made it into the Leader’s segment of the Wave.

Forrester Wave_Cloud Collaboration.jpg
Forrester Wave Online Collaboration: Vendors included in the Wave
 

Before looking at it in detail, there are three main takeaways from the study that put the entire body of research in perspective. They include:

1. Business Agility

To address business problems enterprises must partner with a number of external groups outside the firewall. Cloud-based collaboration tools can be delivered to both PCs and mobile devices and enables the free flow of information.

2. Cloud-based Collaboration Feasibility

Despite the massive strides in security and compliance and the fact that more than half plan to use online collaboration tools in the next two years, many IT leaders still don’t trust online services.

3. Vendors Reassure IT leaders

Following on from this, then, it makes sense that successful vendors in this space are those that can reassure businesses around these issues. Successful vendors in this space will be able to provide the flexibility enterprises require to achieve business goals.

Online Collaboration Appeals

While there is considerable competition in the online collaboration market, Forrester says that the rush to get products to the market is not vendors trying to one-up each other, but reflects a very real and expanded demand for products. More than half of enterprises survey said that they are or will be using SaaS collaboration technologies in the next two years. Business leaders believe SaaS offerings will offer them the following advantages:

Responsiveness

Customers that are increasingly informed and empowered can force an enterprise to change its strategy to suit. Business leaders believe that they will be able to respond to this with technologies that enable easy information flow, and a space outside the firewall where the enterprise can collaborate effectively with clients.

Feature Upgrades

Traditional on-premises software that depends on a three-to-five year refresh cycle prevents enterprises from changing and upgrading outdated software. Online services update themselves, a factor that was mentioned by 60% of those in the survey.

 

Continue reading this article:

 
 

Source : cmswire[dot]com