Pages

Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts

Nov 19, 2012

How Unisys Used the Power of SharePoint to Socially Enable a Global Workforce #spc12

Fresh from the SharePoint Conference in Las Vegas, my overview of a great session looking at how one multi-national company created a vibrant knowledge sharing culture using SharePoint.

I think that along with the analyst sessions, the customer showcase sessions at SharePoint conferences are the most valuable. I was particularly looking forward to this session as Unisys has long been at the forefront of collaboration and social computing with SharePoint.

I covered a session on Communities at Unisys at last year's SharePoint conference here on CMSWire. In this session, Gloria Burke, Director of Knowledge and Collaboration Strategy and Governance, took us through the three year journey to develop a global social intranet at Unisys.

To add a little extra spice, Gloria had this week been named as one of the top 7 Social Business Leaders of 2012. The stage was set.

Challenges

Speaking to an audience of over 300 people, Gloria opened the session by setting the scene at Unisys, a worldwide IT Services company with over 22,500 employees in 100 countries, dealing with both commercial and government clients.

The challenges that the business faced in 2010 would probably be very familiar, Gloria told us. They included knowledge silos, employees struggling to locate subject matter experts, an inefficient on-boarding system, a disconnect between ideas and innovation, and an inconsistent approach to the capture and re-use of knowledge. Everyone seemed to agree that this sounded all too familiar.

Vision

Gloria described her approach to dealing with these challenges. She had begun with a series of leadership interviews to assess internal views. For the external view, she had engaged analyst organizations such as Forrester Research and Gartner who provided external benchmarking. She used these inputs to define an end state vision for both tools and culture over a three year period.

The key elements of that vision included the development of a knowledge sharing culture, enabling employees to build a professional online persona, leveraging social tools to streamline access to information, integrating social tools into core business processes and empowering employees.  To realize the vision, the program would have to have five key work streams:

  1. connection and collaboration
  2. intellectual capital capture, repurpose and reuse
  3. knowledge access, management and governance
  4. infrastructure and application
  5. culture and transformation.

Tools

We were shown a timeline which illustrated the Unisys journey over the past three years. The journey began in June 2010 with the deployment of SharePoint MySites, which included integration to import skills from employees from PeopleSoft into MySite Profiles.

This was followed by the launch of a center for Communities of practice. The center provided information and features to help users find, join and organize communities, and included a community manager tool. Gloria emphasized that there had been a focus on both strategic — or top-down communities, and organic — or bottom-up communities.

Communities at Unisys are categorized as know what, know how, know who, and know more. Variations on classic knowledge management definitions I noted. Employees are hard aligned to communities relating to their business unit, but also have the option to self-subscribe to communities in which they are interested.

 

Continue reading this article:

 
 

Source : cmswire[dot]com

Nov 5, 2012

How CEO Mark Parker Runs Nike To Keep Pace With Rapid Change

“The World’s Most Creative CEO” says Nike’s culture is perfectly suited for the new, unpredictable age of business.

“The last thing we want,” says Nike CEO Mark Parker, “is to be a big dumb company that feels we can put a swoosh on something and people will buy that.”

I first met Parker three years ago, at a quiet lunch in New York. He’s a tall man, a former college track star and a world-class marathoner. He’s designed enormously successful sneakers. He’s hung around with every bold-named athlete you can think of, at venues around the globe. You might expect him to be a larger-than-life presence, an intimidator. But he’s not. He isn’t without confidence, certainly, and he’s highly competitive. But he’s more inclined to listen and reflect. He doesn’t fit the expectation of a traditional big-company CEO.

We profiled Parker two years ago, calling him “The World’s Most Creative CEO.” How many chief executives sketch out product designs as a form of relaxation and engagement? How many meet with street artists and collect their work, not simply for personal pleasure but to evolve their understanding of our global culture?

Parker and I had dinner after my first Generation Flux feature, and he encouraged me to continue the thread of coverage. So I reached out to him when I embarked on the second installment.

Business At The Speed Of Swoosh

“Things are accelerating,” Parker says. “But it’s not as if we’re in a speed-up, slow-down world. It’s a high-velocity world, we’re digitally connected, everything is changing.”

This type of climate, he contends, fits into Nike’s longtime culture. “Our management approach hasn’t come from studying and reading business books. It’s more intuitive, from the culture of sports. We’re constantly looking for ways to improve. How do you adapt to your environment and really focus on your potential? To really go after that, you have to embrace the reality that it is not going to slow down. And you have to look at that as half full, not half empty.”

“Companies and people look at the pace of change as a challenge, an obstacle, a hurdle,” Parker notes. “We like to look at it as opportunity: Get on the offense.”

How To Be Goliath In A David Market

I asked Parker if being a big organization was a disadvantage in an era of rapid change. “I don’t think it's true that size by definition limits adaptability, flexibility,” he says. “We’re a big global brand, we have great resources. We break the business into definable subsets based on different consumer cultures and go deep, to be meaningful and relevant to them.”

But he acknowledges that size can have complications. “At a big company, often size turns into constipation, it fogs the lens about what’s really happening. Sometimes with size and success comes the notion that since we’ve done things to be successful, we have the formula and can institutionalize it. That can be death.”

“You have to challenge what’s worked,” Parker observes. “If we said, okay, we have the formula for design and manufacturing footwear--that’s a myopic and short-term view.” They would never have then pursued FlyKnit, a new Nike technology that allows shoes to be sewn from thread instead of cut from sections of fabric. “One of the challenges of innovation is challenging a set model. A traditional way to manufacture footwear existed for hundreds of years. Now we have a whole new way.”

Aren’t there people within an organization that resist changing? “It’s natural for people to be comfortable the way things are,” Parker says. “My job, our job, is to not close the mind. With FlyKnit, I was very involved. You look at the potential--it could be game changing--you encourage it, it creates momentum.”

Top-Down Vs. Bottom-Up

At Nike, Parker says, “It’s a mix. Traditional hierarchic top-down is archaic, it’s just not real. On the other side, everything is not bubble-up. That ratio, top-down to bubble-up, will shift based on situations. I’m a big believer that there’s no one single approach.”

“Sometimes, you need to go hard and fast,” he allows, “and [from the top] we can make that happen. Ideas may come from the bottom up but the direction and support can go top-down.” Parker looks for bottom-up ideas, by walking the halls at Nike. “I’ll see something on corner of someone’s desk and ask, ‘What’s that?’ All of a sudden, a new thing is on the priority list.”

“You have to be open to ideas from different parts of the company, from different parts of the world. The biggest sources of opportunity are collaboration and partnership. And today, with digital communication, there is more of that everywhere. We need to expose ourselves to that as a matter of doing business.”

Making Choices From Infinite Possibilities

“That’s one of the greatest challenges,” Parker admits. “We are an idea-rich organization. Never have I seen more opportunity. How do you pick? You don’t always pick the right things, you have to edit out.”

Parker has a term he uses to describe the requirement: Edit and Amplify. “The ability to edit and amplify is so critical. It is consuming for me, the choices we need to make in every part of our business.” Earlier this year, Parker noted that Nike’s R&D group had 350 ideas being explored. He recognized that the number was too high. “We had too many projects. Some are clearly more important than others.” So he pushed the group to make some hard choices. He got personally involved--not specifically selecting projects, but working with the R&D team to set up criteria to evaluate. “What are the things we want to accomplish? How do these rate against those criteria?” They cut the idea list down to 50.

“There’s a real discipline to this,” Parker says. “It’s going to sound bureaucratic, but it's not. There’s a difference between discipline and bureaucracy.”

“You can’t always predict the winners,” he continues. “I end up asking a lot of questions, so the team thinks things through. I don’t say ‘Do this, do that.’ I’m not a micromanager. I don’t believe in that. My father, when I was growing up, would say to me when I had to make a decision, ‘Well what do you think?’ And I’d say, ‘Well, I think this.’ And he’d say, ‘That seems like a good idea.’ And over time, I started picking for myself. I didn’t need to go to him. At Nike, we have incredibly strong people. They know what to do.”

How To Model A Modern Leadership Team

“You don’t need to be here four or five years to have great ideas heard. I go out and seek ideas from lower parts of company, maybe a new designer fresh out of school. Sometimes its good to see raw ideas at a basic level. I like to pull that out, put it in the spotlight, celebrate that ideas come from everywhere. There’s real value to show everyone in the company that you can make a difference. In many cases, things that happened off the grid have become a massive success.” Parker’s own career was elevated by what he calls “a little side project”: the idea of “visible air,” or Nike Air as you likely know it, which drove massive value for Nike for many years. A more recent example, he notes, is Nike’s line of Free footwear, which also came out of a side project. “Now it’s a billion-dollar franchise,” Parker notes.


Source : fastcompany[dot]com

Collaboration and Communications on the Intranet

The five fundamental purposes to intranets are: content, communication, collaboration, activity and culture. Each purpose plays a key role in meeting staff and organizational needs and successful intranets maintain a balance between all five.

Intranet teams benefit from having a clear picture of the current focus of their intranets, highlighting areas of strength and weakness. By focusing on improving key areas, intranet teams can transform their intranets into valuable business tools.

This article focuses on two of the five purposes and looks at where intranets are in terms of communication and collaboration. 

 

Communications

Intranets can do much to support communication and collaboration, which are now seen as integral to the success of modern organizations. Over the past few years we have seen intranets evolve in these areas from just providing news on the home page and the odd project collaboration space, to delivering tailored news, giving staff the ability to comment on, like or add to news articles, and promoting the use of social and other collaborative tools.

In Step Two’s annual Intranet Innovation Awards we have seen improvements in these areas including innovative use of team-based collaboration tools, knowledge-sharing initiatives, integration of other communication channels and uses of technologies such as blogs and wikis.

Intranet Communications Tailored to User Needs

The intranet has a clear role to play as a corporate communication channel, one that reaches most staff across the organization.

On most intranets, this consists of one or more news boxes on the home page, publishing regular items of organization-wide interest. While the intranet’s role as a communications channel is well recognized, it only delivers on this objective when the site is being regularly used, and news alone isn’t enough to draw staff to the site.

We are now seeing a move to tailoring communications to the needs of the audience with home page news including corporate messages as well as departmental, local or role-specific messages. As the intranet delivers greater business value within organizations, we see more effective use of intranet news.

Microblogging and the use of activity streams within the enterprise were prevalent among this year’s Intranet Innovation Award entries. While this is becoming standard in many intranets, success is not as common. 

Collaboration

Historically, there has been little corporate recognition of collaboration, and teams and business units were left with just email and shared network folders. Intranets acted solely as publishing and news platforms, providing access to corporate documents but not directly supporting collaboration.

The changing organizational landscape has made collaboration an imperative, to support knowledge sharing, enhance service delivery and improve competitiveness. In this year’s Intranet Innovation Award entries, we saw the continuation of the key theme that intranets were becoming increasingly "social" and more informal.

We also predicted that they would start to add more business value and this appears to be correct this year too. However, there is some way to go before social tools are truly integrated into core processes and workflow.

Social Tools Positioned Around how People Work

We are starting to see the use of social tools being positioned much more around how people work, than the value of the tools themselves. In this year’s awards, both Stockland and Coca-Cola Enterprises delivered new iterations of their intranets that integrated social tools into their homepages.

 

Continue reading this article:

 
 

Source : cmswire[dot]com

Oct 18, 2012

Is Gen Y the Key to Social Business Strategy?

The emergence of social business as a new way of working is now mirroring the runaway popularity of platforms such as Facebook with its origins in youth culture. As I’ve been chatting with my kids and their friends, who are taking their first steps into the world of work, it seemed to me that a rich vein of breakthrough thinking may be available to their new employers.

The Up-and-Coming Generation Collaborate Online

A natural focus for their social life on the move

Am I alone in finding that it’s tough to get much response these days via email? Why is WhatsApp eating Gmail for breakfast? Generation Y hasn’t suffered email overload like their parents — their email defaults to spam and the vast bulk of it is blissfully ignored.

What counts is quality, immediacy, connectivity and the ability to “pull” relevant content. Look at the emergence of micro-networks such as littlemonsters.com with its multi-lingual chat feature, where one million Lady Gaga fans have registered in the three months since its launch. Not so “micro” any more, it’s easy to see how networks such as this are going to be monetized. Enterprises seeking to drive value from their collaborative tools please take note.

They “Get” the Power of Collaboration Tools

They’re drawn intuitively to streamlined ways of working

An example came up in a specialist PR agency with a strong heritage of providing their clients with relevant briefings from the trade press. The business process works efficiently enough, but with quite a linear information flow based on well-worn traditions.

Knowing the power of automated online search, content filtering, aggregation and community-based forums, it seemed evident to my daughter after just a few days of work experience that more could potentially be achieved for and with the firm’s clients, at lower cost all round. New starters bring a keen eye for any wasted effort and are inclined to challenge anything too “clunky” to use in practice.

Sharing Valuable Knowledge & Experience is How They Learn

They’re schooled in exchanging authentic content via a high-quality network

Students are generally much bolder than their parents in publishing their thoughts and ideas; they welcome feedback and find it highly productive to be part of an open discussion. In guiding candidates through the recruitment jungle, employers seek to showcase how they have fully embraced the digital future: they realize how attractive that is to forward-thinking graduates.

But does the practical reality of career development live up to the hype? Are organizations still too dependent on personal/standalone content, which lacks up-to-date context and refresh, with multiple versions perpetuated through straggly email trails? Standalone content quickly gathers digital dust, and the up-and-coming generation prefer to sweep clean.

They’re Impatient for Advancement

They reject hierarchical structures and organizational silos

Could the learning and career development of new starters also be accelerated through social business? Online interaction with communities of peers, the organization’s specialists and end-users for problem-solving, sharing of experience and lessons-learnt, is already demonstrating impressive results according to the latest case studies. Is it time now to challenge the time-served approach to career development? Try appointing an early-stage graduate as a moderator of key discussion forums and watch their pace of learning take off!

The disruptive potential of social technologies is clear: both as a productivity boost and in the quality of results achieved for customers. As organizations search for the formal justification to roll-out social tools, they should perhaps turn to their newest recruits for inspiration to make social business “the way we work around here.”

Editor's Note: Paul's is the latest in our series on the evolution of the intranet and enterprise collaboration.
 

About the Author

Paul gained a first class degree in Physics from Oxford University, and a postgraduate Management Diploma at Manchester. He built a successful career in engineering, and then in management consultancy as a Partner at Accenture advising High Technology businesses. Since 2005, Paul has built up KorteQ's information and knowledge management services based on a successful track record of innovation. More recently he has led the evolution of consulting services from a heritage in learning and knowledge management to social business solutions, on which he’s an authoritative speaker at industry events. He keeps fit as a keen cyclist and every June may be found riding up or down an Alp in aid of the Fireflies charity organisation.

 
 

Source : cmswire[dot]com

Sep 10, 2012

Report: Corporate Culture Important to Employees, But Execs May Look at it Wrong

Business executives see a clearly defined business strategy as being somewhat more important to a company’s success than corporate culture. But employees see the two as being near-equal determinants of success.

That dichotomy is found in a new survey on corporate culture from consulting firm Deloitte, called Culture in the Workplace.

Corporate Culture Affect Employees

Both executives and employees, according to the survey, overwhelmingly feel that a “distinct workplace culture” is important to business success, and that having “engaged and motivated employees” is the top factor.

Not surprisingly, the survey also found that most employees who say their company has a “clearly articulated and lived culture” report that they are “happy at work” and feel “valued.” The correlation is very strong — of those who say their company has a distinct culture, 84 percent report being happy at work and 86 percent say they are valued.

Comparable percentages of those reporting they are happy and valued were found among employees who say “senior leadership regularly communicates my company’s core values and beliefs” and “senior leadership acts in accordance with the company’s core values and beliefs.”

The only fall-off in the correspondence is for those who say that “my boss speaks to me often about our company’s culture.” For those employees, 57 percent report being happy at work and 63 percent say they are valued.

Execs May Not Get It

Executives appear to be using social media internally, in an attempt to build corporate culture and to appear accessible, but the impact may not be as much as they think it is. Forty-five percent of executives believe that social media has a positive impact on workplace culture, but only 27 percent of employees do.

Similarly, executives have what the report described an “an inflated sense” of workplace culture, compared to employees’. For instance, 67 percent of employees think that “senior leadership regularly communicates my company’s core values,” while 83 percent of executives do. Eighty-one percent of executives believe that “senior leadership acts in accordance with the company’s core values and beliefs,” but only 69 percent of employees do.

In order to accomplish culture-building, the report advises, companies should focus more on the intangible. Executives see the tangibles, such as financial performance or competitive compensation, as the most important factors, while employees favor intangibles — regular and candid communications, employee recognition and access to management/leadership.

The survey, conducted for Deloitte by Harris Interactive, questioned 1308 individuals in the U.S., including 303 executives.

 
 

Source : cmswire[dot]com